Dr. Peter Meier
Zürich (Switzerland)

 Reframing Knowledge Work

APS.gif (1053 bytes)

 

Same Level:

[Home]
[Up]
[Conventions]
[Tuning-in]
[Means]
[Priority]
[Language]
[Culture]
[World View]
[Substantiality]

 

 

   

The Limitations and Possibilities of Cultures

A culture has to serve the purpose of life-fulfillment or it fosters non-sustainable end-technology. We have to learn to own our culture rather than be owned by it! At this leading edge of human interaction the impossible can happen; a purely rationally functional Saul can turn into a Paul and overcome his detachment from the requirements of a sustainable qualitative growth through a consciously loving and healing cooperation.

We do not have to re-invent the wheel or reconstruct our potential with our emotions; we are here to discover, uncover and express our potential using our life. For that purpose we need accurate indications of our true potential and ways to transform the threatening breakdowns of our emotional righteousness into breakthroughs which allow our potential to unfold. Since APS® is not based on generally accepted denotations that fit the trend, but rather on the basic open-ended generative principles, it does justice to the potential of real people. It can provide such indications sufficiently on the basis of accurate mapping and application with the resonance-principle.

The APS-approach promoted here seeks conditions in which emotions can reveal the underlying essence of our lives before the point of no return from being coerced by necessities and having to learn things the hard way by loosing substance. Coercion leaves people damned, stuck in a vicious emotional cycle. But we must remember that most people consider it easier to fly to the moon, support a war of ethnic cleansing, or join in mobbing at the office on a smaller scale, rather than to create human conditions sustainable for life-fulfillment for as many as possible. Why is this so? There are answers to be uncovered intellectuals don't like!

Our culture should supports us in dealing with what we perceive of each other, the external reality. We experience ourselves, if we care at all, from an altogether different point of view than what the humanities suggest and we obtain little support from outside for reflection upon this experience. We experience ourselves in our substantiality in terms of our intentions and the successes and failures. We experience in attempting to manifest ourselves and in trying to be cause for an effect, and fulfill our purpose.

In Japan there are more members of religious organization than there are people; religion is a mental consumer god to be used differently for different occasions. Similarly in post-modern times where "anything goes" goes, world-views are dealt with like scenarios: For the sake of making money one seeks "Flat Earth" societies, and for comforting ones conscience one goes to church to indulge in ritualized social gatherings, or as an intellectual put it: "It is amazing how much effort people make to indulge in religious socializing...". Whoever participated in it, must admit that such practices dilute the meaning of another wise meaningful service and prevent its inclusion in everyday life - for the show must go on uninterrupted by personal meaning...

 

© Copyright 2008, Dr. Peter Meier, usage other than personal for oneself, requires authorization by the author

Dr. Peter Meier, Zürich, pm@think-systems.ch; ongoing Research&Development since 1979

In depths:

  Appeal - Contents - Introduction - Zeitgeist - Up-to-date (in German)
  Getting Practical with https://options4.think-systems.ch