Dr. Peter Meier
Zürich (Switzerland)

 Reframing Knowledge Work

APS.gif (1053 bytes)

 

Same Level:

[Home]
[Up]
[Conventions]
[Tuning-in]
[Means]
[Priority]
[Language]
[Culture]
[World View]
[Substantiality]

 

 

   

Reality Language

kewl.gif (1537 bytes)Everyday language has become our limit and in many instances people behave worse than wild beasts when they come up against this limit of their culture, e.g. decay of Ex-Yugoslavia! Before Newton introduced modern mathematics there were mostly opinions and guesswork about the laws of nature. Probably our generation is the last one that can afford guesswork about the requirements for sustainable life and being. The classic, detached attitude of the subject-object relationship is the source of unacceptable consequences! We are drawn into fatally as long as we are simply using the denotative language in the generally accepted way. Without a sustainable personal attitude and the corresponding whole-hearted involvement we are loosing touch with our substance. Indeed,  APS® is not just the needed new science, it allows redesigning the trend by accounting for the individual innate differences in a mutually beneficial way. Intellectuals hate this idea, they want to confine people within the existing set of words. The have not understood, that modularization was the key for progress in hardware, and subroutines the key in software. Similarly the key for mental progress such as OEGP, is in more adequate concepts than what psychology offers! Intellectual and scribes dismiss such updates as scientific jargon, defending their position that allows them to go on with their hidden agenda of insisting on closed-systems at the cost of hard working people: The procrastinated decay Ex-Yugoslavia is a typical case of the self-destructive nature of closed systems. By the way, Karatzic was a psychiatrists before he became a genocide priest... 

When individuals want to communicate to the mass they need the insight how to set the scene first to get a chance to promote the desirable outcome of one-to-many interactions. However, on a one-to-one basis there is no such unpredictable detour through the collective that usually leaves things to their chaotic outcome! The graceful application of adequate knowledge of APS® allows the sender to map and thus to acknowledge the areas of consciousness, functionality and rationality of a specific receiver. This requires a personal vision that is not based on past failures. We need to be free from such memories rather that trying to embellish them as "successes" by using better methods and technologies like rhetoric and virtual reality (emperor's new cloth, Pontjomkin's villages).

An effective vision can only be based on a personally successful past impact, and on paying full attention to one's true potential for healing, and fulfillment with integrity. Although APS® has a scientific basis, unlike other objective methods it requires the involvement of human beings because it does not deal in mapping objective facts with personally-neutral and detached opinions, but life-experiences to which we only have access on a personal level. In addition an awareness of the possible basic ways humans express themselves is required. Only then is the willingness to step back from one's own formal and habitual ways of doing things possible, in order to provide the loving space for a mutually beneficial interaction. It is not a matter of replacing humans with robots or remotely controlling their minds by "proven methods"! We aim for a conscious integration of methods and technologies in view of the lifefulfillment of those affected by conscious humans to allow synergy among those concerned. 

 

© Copyright 2008, Dr. Peter Meier, usage other than personal for oneself, requires authorization by the author

Dr. Peter Meier, Zürich, pm@think-systems.ch; ongoing Research&Development since 1979

In depths:

  Appeal - Contents - Introduction - Zeitgeist - Up-to-date (in German)
  Getting Practical with https://options4.think-systems.ch