|
Reality versus Substantiality, c3 versus C3
Reality
cause
action in terms of denotational, mass-attractive
virtuality.
Substantiality give rise to connotational, personally-relevant
meaning. In short people who do not understand lifefulfillment,
want everything in their image as if the were God...
The Golden Calf Test: Look at the
Objects
by which you express yourself and Verify their
Extreme
impact in itself, e.g. its style, before you give in to them, defaulting
your conscience to the mere formal impact and its rituals...
 Hardware is
follows software
which should follow people; why should the the trend be ahead of people?
Imagine a trend and nobody follows it; the trend is now chaos,
do you follow it?
 You may hide behind your fig-leaf; your
opinions. Or you might genuinely experiment with them until you essence finds its fulfillment in the
whole, then taking the responsibility among participants and those concerned for Timely
Exchange of Project-Orientated Competence.
If
there were maps of the individual claims people make on the possible areas of work,
life and being we would have adequate knowledge and we could settle the problem of
evil! However we would require a way to express human impact that not only covers work
rationally (past), but encompasses the functionality of life (present) and the awareness
of love and healing (future) as well. Both, the
- denotatively generalizing political
correctness of our culture as well as
- the indicative connotational impulses of our personal life with its
- emotions that, not
overcome, basically trap into everyday social
dimensions
are inadequate for the purpose of optimizing life-fulfillment in
a culture of any size. That is why we are stuck in our culture, even if we try with the
best of intentions and the greatest visions to get out of it when it closes
and then becomes self-destructive as have so far all man-made trends! The answer to the failing
c3
is not chaos chit-chat; this is the consequence of defaulting C3 to
Ce-zeitgeist, the established
communication; the answer is the corner stone, today's stumbling block,
C3: We urgently need an adequate way to express
ourselves without losing touch with ourselves! Applied Personal Science
APS® is the now proven answer to this need.
However, to get across with this message, we need
listeners and receivers who can overcome their detached attitudes. This communication
problem cannot be overcome as long as the listener/receiver insists on a model that
excludes the message the sender intends to communicate. This lack of communication
increases the social tension and the global problems until either the sender
gives up in resignation, or the receiver gives in through grace, or until neither has any
more living space available. |
