| |
|
1.1.2
The Bottom-line of publically
organized Sciences
Isaac Asimov, biochemist by training, has
worked out the bottom line of the ultimate impact of publically
organized science on human affairs, as science fiction writer
with his
three laws of robotics:
§1) A robot (considered an
assembly of pre-programmed matter just like our world view with
Platonian ideas, tools and concepts) may not injure a human
being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
§2) A robot must obey orders
given to it by human beings (e.g. within the space allocated
to him), except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
§3) A robot must protect its own
existence (with the energy available to it) as long as
such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law (§1
and §2).
Firstly note, he could not work these laws
out within the organized humanities#2, for it is closed on itself, in a
trap. In it, as a so-called
pre-trans-trap, it is not allowing any story telling,
metaphors and personal claims, denounced as ego-trips,
beyond it, even if that would transcend its failures! It
treats this like a crime, preceding its cultivation. For
that reason Asimov's robots existed under the threat of getting their
brain burnt, if they even thought beyond §1-3, and for this Jesus
Christ was crucified. Secondly writing (doing so) in his awesome
SF-books about "galactic history" with such robots of ultimate
performance, he realized beyond the humanities#2, the short-comings
of §1-3. He thus made his robot Giskard realize that too,
and under pain which threatens to burn its positronic brain, follow that
necessity as the metacognition §0, through which he then could
bypass §1 and §2:
§0) A robot may not injure a
humanity (as abstract concept and necessity for the
lifefulfillment
of individuals) or, through inaction, allow a humanity to come to
harm.
In essence this means that humans can not
be responsible for their creations, ideas, tools, concepts, systems up
to humanity; its prime creation, robots, have to take the ultimate
responsibility for themselves, and humans, in the name of "humanity".
All philosophers have come to this conclusion. However, it cannot work
out! Whatever people create without their Creator, following Platonian
ideas instead, excluding conscience as pointed to here, instead of
considering consciousness, following Kant and abolish it as
"subjective", ends up in its closeness from substantiality and the
inner voice from God, because of its innately self-destructive dynamics.
A well-known example is the
Titanic catastrophe
1912, the fall of all past Empires, the last, the "Evil Empire", and now
next in line, the "casino capitalism à la USA".
Ignorants such as philosopher and
intellectuals begin with the 5th Law of Robotics: "A robot
must know it is a robot", and mean every human except themselves, or
even and above all themselves, or Nietzsche, even God, e.g.
philosophies' ideas of "God", according to themselves (him), dead - in
the philosophers pre-trans-traps, sick as a subject of the thus mislead
humanity...
<=
I suggest
you leave the in depths studies until you have covered the basics,
signed with:
=> |
