| |
|
1.2.1.2 Understanding
Understanding is about the
attitude which allows your being (X) to impact
beyond the zeitgeist, and that has consequences!
When Papageno understood just that in "The Magic Flute" of Mozart, he
chickened out with, "I'll remain single" (act 2, scene 2); without the
whole-heartedly desired girl, e.g. without relating to his identity, while
prince Tamino was eager to meet his principle. Being alone without oneself, people are mere subjects,
fulfilling philosophy's time, prey for the zeitgeist, which promises it dies
easier in the mass, in order to amass them all under its
44>42>22>42 33>13 >11 one-track
to the abyss of the very bad (1) in itself; self-destruction.
Understanding takes place
in TN; in the timely (T) relationship revealed in the present (N).
It can occur, according the the knowledge work
defined, from
-
a
subjective interaction
(intuitive rule to work out subjective
interactions: P>N>F>P) on SP,
information from a past (P) space (S) as a so far missing link,
-
an
objective one (F>N>P>F) on EF, the
realized future (F) consequence of applying a specific energy (E),
or
-
an
encompassing one
(F<>P, N<>N) on MN, with what appears a stumbling block (M) in
the present (N), which is then understood to point to a corner stone.
-
a i-needy/s-focussing/o-being
called by TN, the present insight
itself
According to my iso,
MP-TF-EF, this happens to me on o=EF, triggerd by d=doing something
like writing this site about getting as objective as possible about EF. In
any other state of being, I am just amassing evidence for the eventual
understanding. Here is the proof; I promise you, I did not know
where I would end up, when I began writing the following: Statistically speaking 2/3
of all people have no relationship to TN in their i,s,o, but to TP=tradition
evolving from the past, or TF=engagment in view of what will
emerge in the future, say in terms of "give it a try", instead. That
means 8/27 (30%) have no essential possibility for an essential TN=spontaneous understanding
in their i,s,o! In the spirit of
the times,
understanding
is left to tradition, however, the zeitgeist cannot learn from its
history! But since a TP-relationship appeals to 2/3 (1/3 to i,
1/3-1/9 to s, but not to TP in i, 1/3-2/9 to o, but not to TP in i, and not
to s) the zeitgeist can talk them into waiting for it to
manifest. Too bad it is continuously self-destructive and drags those
who depend on it, with it. And that explains the evil tendency of
demo-crazy when a majority of people default to TP, under the spell of
the corresponding infotainment of
the zeitgeist!
Do you understand/get
it, why marketing and spin doctors of all kind grow like the plague!
Do you realize how mind-blow this insight, worth a Nobel-prize is, when
enough people would act upon it and do justice to TN-understanding and with
due respect would ask for proof, requireing a corresponding TF-engagement! In terms of T, the
skript of my being
is FFN with Isd, e.g. I focus (s) on an engagement (F) in conceptualizing (I)
the engaged (F) doing (d), so it can be understood (N) in its
lifefulfilling consequences. The is indeed how I fulfil my life in my time (T)!
|
