|
|
1.1.5 Relax and be grateful for who you
are
With the symbolism
iso, whereby i,s,o
can be M,S,E,T we have, just as in the I GING, and for that matter in
the genetic code,
43=64 different OEGP-lifefulfillment
principles, such as MTE that does justice to me. Just bear with me, we
will come to the stage, where we associate words and pictures with those 64 OEGPs and reveal and prove it relevance in real life. We are still
getting the basic APS-operation symbolically in place. It is like
studying physics, you first need to master the mathematics; this one is
much easier, and the difficult part is almost over, so relax and repeat
what was defined above until you have gone through your mAG-emotional
cycle und can deal with:
* |
subjective |
objective |
encompassing interaction |
example X=MTE its states of being's
focus |
M
V |
E
G |
S
Z |
T
Z |
i=M: a=E, p=S, I=T |
S
G |
T
Z |
M
V |
E
G |
* VGZ rules were intuitively
derived |
E
Z |
M
V |
T
G |
S
V |
o=E: e=M, d=T, O=S |
T |
S |
E |
M |
s=T: f=S, t=E, S=M |
So given a lifeprinciple, e.g. that of
the Swiss mentality, MES, you may work out all its
states of being, which we shall call "essential
modes" from now on: a=EES, p=SES, I=TES / f=MMS, t=MTS,
S=MSS / e=MET, d=MEM, O=MEE, which happens to be as in the
above example, t(MTE), e.g. my t=thinking
poses a O=challenge to the Swiss mentality and vice versa. Everyone who
knows me can acknowledge that and so can I, living in Switzerland. It
implies, that I, like everyone else is who he or she is, and
also according to studies, that the 64 OEGP are pretty well equally distributed in
any population. In addition we are conditioned among other things , by our
national mentality. The latter is in some countries, such as Japan in
my experience 1985, so deeply rooted to the point where it is almost
impossible to address a specific Japanese man as who he is, while
in other cultures, such as Bali, people are much more in
understanding
each others being. In the meantime the zeitgeist's distortion of
the individual's substance is replacing the cultural conditioning more
an more; a serious problem and one of the hardest challenge for modeling
with APS - it's done, but here we still have along way to go, to make it
understandable and above all, practically applicable for a turnaround.
Having thus made the essential modes
operational, after identifying participants, as a topic to be
covered, we can parameterize the potential impact of everyone in
a team in the desired dimensions. That is the onset of considering
lifefulfilling platforms to replace the prevail organizational forms
which ultimately despise real human beings. In the above example
Switzerland, which I challenge with my thinking need not pre-trans-trap
me, and I need not be ruined by not being able to cope with the
prevailing Swiss thinking's challenge to me, if there is enough understanding
on both side. Having gibe you those glimpses where we
are going with APS as science#3, I hope your realize that it is worth
the effort of studying seriously. Just consider the effort to learn
another language! Here we talk about the "language of
lifefulfillment"!
Or do you prefer to go on dwelling in a world where you only have the
choice to be a "free" wolf, a perpetrator, or a "free" sheep, a victim
of the zeitgeist?
<=
=> |