| |
|
1.1.3 What is the MATTER in SPACE, what
ENERGY can move it in TIME?
The following interpretation of the
I GING's so called hexagrams or kuas resolves the
pre-trans-trap of organized science; it
does justice to real human beings in their potential, to perceive i=Input
in an s=internal state, moving towards a personally meaningful
o=Output, and that on a #3=subjective, and a #1,2,0,
dominantly #2=objective level:
|
Hexagram 50 and
its relevance for the
author |
|
n n
n n |
#2-o:
Applying my resources in tangible ways, considering my insights
thus gained
#2-s: Working out a conceptual space
allowing the modeling of real human systems
#2-i: Getting the relevant facts of the
history of science and its short-comings
#3-o:
Working out concepts relevant to my intention
#3-s: Considering reframing with my own
resources
#3-i: Open for the unacceptable state of
science concerning real human systems
Pairing objective/subjective lines to make an encompassing
i,s,o, in each of i,s,o there are 4 possibilities:
|
|
#2-o
#3-o |
Here
my output Yang/Yang (11)=E=energy - I use for this output
here, based on my internal motivators... |
|
n n
|
#2-s
#3-s |
My
internal state Yin/Yang (10)=T=Time, concerned with the impact
of giving meaning to substance in the life time of a real human
being... |
n n |
#2-i
#3-i |
My
input Yang/Yin=M=Matter (01), the subjective space left to
deal with the pre-trans-trapping
hindrances posed by the zeitgeist... |
|
n n
n n |
|
The
remaining combination Yin/Yin=S=space (00); I needed to
find out how I, being MTE, can get the space with my
modes of
being:
|
So what is operational about this?
Assuming that a subjective interaction#3 flips that line, then
#3(M,T,E,S)=>E,S,M,T and similarly that
an objective interaction#2, enhance by #0=art and #1=technology flips
the objective line we get #2(M,T,E,S)=>S,E,T,M.
An encompassing interaction involving the flipping of both lines say by
a convincing piece of art#0, or a major physical impact#1 leads to
M,T,E,S=>T,M,S,E. It turns out that an
objective flip results in the input in p=perception, t=thinking
and d=doing, an subjective flip: in
the input in a=intuition, f=feeling and e=ego/survival
reaction, an
encompassing flip in the input in I=concepts, S=defocus
and O=challenge. You might need this printed and have time to
think - just looking at it just frightens some.Thus if as
above MTE models me X=being, then my p=STE, t=MEE,
d=MTT, a=ETE, f=MSE, E=MTM, I=TTE, S=MME,
O=MTS. Figure it out for MES, which is relevant for Switzerland (CH).
Then you find that O (CH with the relevant X=MES)=X (Peter
Meier/ MTE), e.g. the impact of my being poses a O=Challenge
for Switzerland - for reframing its knowledge work, the claim I stated
here with! Do you begin to see where we are getting at? To make sense
out of all of this needs much more theoretical work and your inner
practical work, so bear with me, just as you hopefully did, when the
sentence of Pythagoras was proven to you. However, be aware, that
you need to be consciously, not just intellectually aware in order to be
able to follow up and qualify for an understanding which will
change
your outlook on your life, and thus your potential to fulfill
it with an appropriate impact on the world and your fellow
humans! |
