|
2.3.3 The Global Redesign Initiative
In the context
of the current WEF I looked at the
Global Redesign Initiative. Global points to the world,
now possibly in its final crisis because its underlying paradigm has
exhausted its usefulness. Do we need to redesign the world, or
those who keep designing it? The former has been tried for centuries and
the corresponding knowledge work has not really worked to a
desirable end. So since 1979 I have addressed the issue of the mental
operating systems of the designers. It is all about the fundamental
rethinking of relating to and
understanding each other. The thesis I am working with since
1979 is:
1.
The
established science of nature#1
(numbers), the humanities#2
(words), and the arts#0
(forms) are necessary, but not sufficient to really
understand real human systems in the way required to redesign the
presently prevailing organizations towards what is desirable, Life
Fulfilling Platforms. For that reason I have founded
Applied Personal
Science#3
APS® to model
real human systems based on
open-ended
generative principles,
OEGP.
The actual practical work
since 2008 is
in German and
covers almost any walk of life both individual and collective.
2. It
has been demonstrated beyond any doubt that the science#1,2,0, as
necessary as they might be, cannot solve the problems of living
together in a life-fulfilling way; the alternative being global
self-destruction in the thus self-destructive systems man has so far
created. The signs are on all walls of almost every organization
and in an increasing number of individuals, up to the war for, and
against terror.
3. APS®
provides the now operational basis for life-fulfilling work
fulfillment based on thinking beyond numbers, words
and the appearances of forms. It has been proven in many real
life situations in many cultures. But it has also revealed that the
present social conditioning in terms of the one out of
sixteen dimensions of social interactions,
e.g. Bm, general boundary conditions (B) evoked by the
multiplication (m) of what tends to be mass-attractive at the
time, leads to an error rate of
78%
[in German]
in mutual understanding.
That of course cannot provide any desirable future! This claim is
manifest for real human beings with eyes to see, and ears to hear;
beyond the Bm-monopolitical mania that has been at the centre of
our culture since philosophy was invented…
4. In view of
the utmost importance of the Global Redesign Initiative I take
it, that you thoroughly study the above indications and do your part to
open the way to include science#3 in time for a truly
timely
exchange of project-oriented competence.
That is required for a critical number of real humans to overcome
the
otherwise pre-trans-trapping 78% error rate in the prevailing
knowledge work, both on the top with its now global amplification
factor, and at the bottom of human activities…
5. The Bm-socially
conditioned response to the above is that 22%
deal with it
[in German]constructively
towards t=transcending the problem towards a solution.
On the other hand 29% react in a p=primitive way not even
consistent with cultivated reason, like the barbarians preceding
culture
by side-tracking say to mammon, 30% retreat to their comfort zones,
shielding them off so they become their self-destructive T=traps.
The remaining 19% are plainly G=against it pretending
their existing world is the best possible. Thus 78% of the socially
conditioned people drive sufficient considerations with the then
possible solutions into pre-trans-traps, just as Jesus Christ (t)
after many
temptations was crucified by them while a terrorist (p) was pardoned, and
the Pharisees remained in the trap (T) of their temple money making cult
which was then soon afterwards destroyed forever by the Romans, while
the intellectuals still campaign against (G) the loving God, Jesus
witnessed for. They do it with the claim to be mass-attractive towards
their global Bm-idolatry - some of the most subtle ones
use Christian rhetoric... |
